Managing Local Changes with Mercurial Queues

From gem5
Revision as of 17:51, 16 February 2013 by Atgutier (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Repository Management Problem

gem5 users typically opt to freeze their repository at a particular changeset when starting a new research project. This approach has several downsides:

  • It discourages users from contributing back any useful changes they may develop.
  • If a useful change is added upstream, it's a long, tedious process to update.

If a user chooses to keep their local repository up-to-date with the source tree they typically use named branches and merge any upstream changes into their branches. This approach also has its downsides:

  • If any local change needs to be updated, it requires a separate commit.
  • If you have several small, unrelated changes and separate branches must be maintained.
  • Upstream changes must be merged into the local branches.

A powerful tool that overcomes these problems is the mercurial queue extension.

Mercurial Queues